OpenEvidence
AI search for medical questions, built for verified clinicians at the point of care
Linked from openevidence.com · checked 29 Oct
- Tool type
- AI medical information search for clinicians
- Made for
- Verified clinicians
- Runs on
- Web browser and iOS/Android apps
- Available on openevidence.com and the OpenEvidence iOS/Android apps.
What it does
OpenEvidence helps clinicians research medical questions using AI-generated answers grounded in medical literature. Users enter a question, then review a response and its cited sources. Its licensed content includes clinical findings, figures and tables from publishers such as the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA Network and Nature Portfolio, alongside other medical reference material.
The service supports both quick reference questions and more detailed evidence reviews. Clinicians can choose a faster response or a deeper investigation, and some modes ask for further clinical context before weighing the literature. The web service and iOS and Android apps provide access to the same product, making it possible to continue research across devices.
OpenEvidence is intended for verified clinicians rather than general consumer diagnosis. The company describes access as free for verified clinicians; users must complete its eligibility process. Generated summaries still need professional review of the cited evidence and the clinical context. Separate research-preview models have restricted access and should not be assumed to be included in an ordinary account.
What it can do
- Answer clinical reference questions with citations to medical literature
- Surface licensed journal findings, figures and tables
- Choose between faster answers and deeper literature investigations
- Ask clarifying questions and incorporate clinical context in supported research modes
Example workflows
- Review evidence for a clinical question
- Illustrative example. Enter a clinical reference question, read the generated summary and open its citations. The output is a set of sources and an evidence summary for professional review.
- Investigate a complex question
- Illustrative example. Choose a deeper research mode, provide relevant context when prompted and inspect the resulting synthesis. Use its linked literature to check the reasoning and identify further reading.
Before you choose
- Answers are AI-generated search results for information purposes and are not medical advice or a diagnostic guarantee; clinicians should verify against primary sources.
- Free access is stated for verified clinicians; general consumer access terms were not confirmed.
- Darwin is in research preview by application only and is not part of the general product.
Listed under
Get started
Create an account and complete the required clinician verification.
- Open the official site and create an account.
- Complete the required clinician verification.
- Ask a question, choose the appropriate research depth and review the cited evidence.
Plans and prices
The official model announcement describes general product access as free for verified clinicians. Confirm regional eligibility during signup; restricted research previews have a separate application process.
OpenEvidence is free to use. See their pricing page ↗
Sources for this overview
Product pages, documentation, and pricing checked 29 Oct 2026. Each source supports part of the overview; availability and prices can change.
- About | OpenEvidence ↗www.openevidence.com
- About | OpenEvidence Foundation ↗www.openevidence.foundation
- Introducing the OpenEvidence Model Family | OpenEvidence Foundation ↗www.openevidence.foundation
- OpenEvidence's Trust Center ↗trust.openevidence.com
Ratings and reviews
No ratings for OpenEvidence yet.
What’s changed
Free accountSignals
Free accountData and security
Free accountCompare with similar tools
Free accountWhere this comes from
How we research- Company website
- openevidence.com: product, pricing and policy pages
- Web archive
- When the site first appeared
- YC directory mirror
- Batch and company name
- Social accounts
- Accounts the company links, and its posts on X
- Human review
- Checked by a person
- knowledge_base
Last checked 29 Oct 2026. Every field keeps its source and date; unknown means we couldn’t confirm it.